51

117 | Airborne Bacteria, Viruses and Spores in poultry premises by High Efficiency Electrostatic Bacterial Air Sampler |
96 | Subdivision of hospital operating department in different areas depending on the biological risk for staff and patients |
95 | Muestreador microbiológico de aire TRIO.BAS TRIO para la detección de contaminación microbiana en salas limpias y entornos controlados. |
76 | SOP – Standard Operating Procedure for use, maintenance, calibration of “TRIO.BAS” microbiological air samplers |
51 | Training of personnel in Cleanroom, Isolator, RABS according USP 38 – The United States Pharmacopeial – Document (1116) Aseptic Processing Environments – Page 1195 |
The aim of this research was to evaluate and compare the results of two microbial air samplers present on the market: the non portable Anderson one stage model and the portable TRIO.BAS MONO system. The air samples were collected in 3 different environments with the two air samplers positioned 1 meter from the other, in absence of personell during the aspiration. The results showed that the variability between the two instruments was not signi cative and was comparable.
To continue, type the password and then click login, or request credentials here.
LOGIN